|
By Lisa Richards
January 21, 2009
According to the latest Associated Press
and Politics Daily reports,
Senator John McCain’s wife Cindy, and their daughter Meghan, are both
supporters
and campaigners for gay marriage. Cindy McCain has posed for
ads wearing duck tape across her mouth and the letters
and number “NOH8”
written on her cheek to symbolize “No Proposition 8,” an anti-Proposition
8 slogan carried by pro-gay marriage supporters and gay activists.
Senator McCain opposed gay marriage in his
campaign for the White House,
never giving any clue to his wife’s stance, or how she might have acted as
a
First Lady. McCain signed Arizona Proposition 102 banning gay marriage
in his home state, saying he still “believes
the sanctity of marriage is
only defined as between one man and one woman,” but says he understands
his wife’s
stance on gay marriage.
Imagine having a First Lady with “NOH8” stamped on her duck-taped face
plastered
all over the country.
According to Cindy McCain and NOH8, she believes party affiliation does
not matter when
it comes to beliefs. Being a Republican does not make a
difference in what campaign you participate in. McCain
and NOH8 say
“marriage equality isn’t a Republican issue any more than it is a Democrat
issue.”
Mrs. McCain is completely off base and wrong: traditional marriage is a
Republican belief and party policy Republicans
fight for and by. It is
Democrats who made abortion and gay marriage their platform and helped
destroy the
family as much as the unborn while supporting every immoral
sexual-life-style. But for one to hold Christian, conservative
Republican
beliefs and positions is considered and deemed hateful toward gays.
Of course the “H”
before the “8” makes the slogan appear to say No Hate,
insinuating that anyone opposing gay marriage hates
gays. Those who
oppose gay marriage do not hate gays; those who support Proposition 8
support traditional
marriages and families and do not want to see the
breakdown of such in America.
Gay marriage institutes a
marriage life-style that cannot produce
children, nor can it rear adopted children in a home with a mother and
father
they way God instituted marriage. But isn’t that the liberal idea
behind the gay marriage fallacy: destroy
traditional marriage and family
so we no longer have children and we have planet population control?
To support
gay marriage is to support the eradication of the family, to
prevent children from being born to real families rather
than
self-centered sexual life-styles demanding to push itself upon society.
Saying no to gay marriage is
not stripping away homosexual rights any more
than saying no to couples living together outside of marriage and
out-of-wedlock
pregnancy. Both break down and destroy the traditional
family, leaving children floundering in a world without
hope and morals.
Both leave children without married mothers and fathers to look up to and
emulate. And both
life-styles can destroy children’s mental facilities
despite sociological arguments gays love to use: it’s
far better for
children to be adopted by loving gay couples than to see them placed in
foster homes or adopted by
abusive people. That argument has brainwashed
too many Americans into becoming complacent to gay marriage and gay
adoption and places children under confusing circumstances that will no
doubt have an effect on how children view sex—it
can be with anyone, in
any way, one desires if it makes you feel good.
Mrs. McCain’s supporting of gay
marriage is supporting the destruction of
traditional childhood, because gays insist upon adopting children.
To say orphans are better off adopted by “loving gay couples” than
“abusive straight couples”
or “placed in foster homes” is a lie. Not all
America households are abusive. Many foster homes
have been loving
refuges for children.
And we wonder why so many teenagers are emotionally dysfunctional?
Gays further insist that children raised by same sex couples do not become
gay. Gay parents do not make
children gay. Where is the proof that
children are not impacted by what they see in the home? How can anyone
say children are not affected by their parent’s actions, beliefs, and
life-style, and who can say a child raised
by gay parents would never
become sexually confused, thinking it perfectly fine to experiment with
both heterosexual
and homosexual life-styles?
And who is to say those children will not buck the tradition and say no to
traditional
marriage, furthering the breakdown of traditional marriage?
Despite sociological studies over the years, claiming
there is no
difference between heterosexual and homosexual couples raising children,
Dr. Timothy J. Dailey, PhD
exposed the fallacy in an article for Orthodoxy
Today title “Homosexual Parenting: Placing Children at risk,”
proving,
through the words of sociologists, who made the claims gay marriage and
gay adoption is as wholesome as
heterosexual parent households, that their
studies are flawed and there is no proof children fare as well in gay
households. http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/DaileyGayAdopt.phpTraditional families, traditional marriage, does not expose children to
sexual life-styles;
traditional parents keep their bedroom doors shut—in
and out of the bedroom, not allowing children to know what
mommy and daddy
do. Gay couples are open about their sexuality, even when bedroom doors
are shut, telling
their children they are gay, allowing their children to
know what the bedroom choice in the home is.
The bedroom
door may not be open Mrs. McCain, but gay marriage and unions
are very open, publically declaring their life-style, which
you, Mrs.
McCain support. In supporting gay marriage, you Mrs. McCain support gay
adoption which, according
to Dr. Dailey, has been falsified as wholesome
when it is not. http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/DaileyGayAdopt.phpNOH8 is just another attempt to demonize people who want marriage between
a man and woman
only and do not want children raised in homes with parents
who are same sex couples.
Mrs. McCain’s involvement
in NOH8 makes Republicans appear to be nothing
but a bunch of homophobic racists who hate anyone disagreeing with their
traditional views. The opposite is true: Republicans and conservatives
against gay marriage do not hate gays;
conservatives want to preserve
traditional marriage and make home-life emotionally safe and loving for
children.
But then again, traditional marriage and family can’t mean anything to a
woman who stole another woman’s
husband.
Lisa Richards ©™ January 21, 2009 All Rights Reserved
www.lisa-richards.com ©™
|
